Which theory BEST explains the mental health problems of creatively eminent persons?

Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Integration is particularly relevant in explaining the mental health issues often encountered by creatively eminent individuals. This theory posits that individuals experience different levels of developmental growth, which can include emotional and psychological struggles as they navigate their unique sensitivities and intense feelings.

Creatively talented individuals often possess heightened emotional experiences, which can lead to inner conflicts and existential dilemmas. Dabrowski suggests that this turmoil can ultimately serve as a catalyst for personal growth and a deeper level of creativity. The process of transformation through these challenges aligns with the experiences of many eminent creatives, who often face intense scrutiny, high expectations, and the burden of their sensitivities.

In contrast, other theories like Erikson's Psychosocial Development emphasize the stages of human development more broadly and do not specifically account for the nuanced relationship between creativity and mental health. Jung’s Archetypes delve into the collective unconscious but may not specifically address the mental health issues associated with creative individuals. Gardner's Multiple Intelligences focuses on diverse cognitive abilities without a dedicated framework for understanding the psychological aspects tied to creativity.

Thus, Dabrowski’s framework uniquely captures the complexities faced by creatively gifted individuals, making it the most applicable theory in understanding their mental health challenges.