Which statement regarding Bloom's taxonomy is incorrect?

In the context of Bloom's taxonomy, the statement that suggests the taxonomy sorts students based on their cognitive ability is misleading. Bloom's taxonomy is designed primarily to classify educational learning objectives and cognitive processes rather than to categorize students by ability. The taxonomy emphasizes the complexity of learning and skill acquisition across six levels: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.

Recognizing that all students, including those who are gifted, can benefit from engaging with the lower levels of the taxonomy highlights the importance of a foundational understanding before moving to more complex tasks. The nature of the taxonomy serves to guide educators in designing assessments and instructional strategies that promote higher-order thinking.

Also, the notion that gifted students may take longer to progress through all levels is not universally true, as gifted learners can often demonstrate advanced understanding and skills, potentially accelerating through many levels when appropriately challenged. Thus, the understanding of Bloom's taxonomy should focus on its purpose as a framework for learning objectives rather than a sorting mechanism for student ability.