Which of the following is NOT an example of full-time homogeneous grouping?

Pullout programs differ from full-time homogeneous grouping as they involve students being removed from their regular classroom for specific periods to receive differentiated instruction, rather than being placed in a setting where they are consistently grouped with others at a similar level for all or most of their instruction. This model allows students to engage with the general curriculum part of the time while also accessing enrichment services, but does not create a fully homogeneous environment.

In contrast, magnet schools, school-within-a-school models, and special schools for the gifted are all designed to provide concentrated, full-time educational experiences for students who exhibit advanced abilities. These settings intentionally group students with similar capacities to enhance their learning through tailored curricula and advanced opportunities. Thus, pullout programs stand apart due to their temporary and often less intensive nature compared to the consistent grouping found in the other options listed.