Which approach is likely more beneficial for teaching critical thinking in gifted education?

Emphasizing problem-solving through real-world applications is highly beneficial in teaching critical thinking, particularly in gifted education. This approach encourages students to engage with complex issues, think creatively, and apply their knowledge in practical contexts. By solving genuine problems, gifted learners can see the relevance of their studies, enhance their analytical skills, and develop their ability to evaluate information critically. Real-world applications foster a deeper understanding as students must not only utilize their existing knowledge but also synthesize new ideas and perspectives, thereby sharpening their critical thinking abilities.

In contrast, relying solely on rote memorization limits the opportunity for students to engage deeply with material and to think independently, while focusing primarily on standardized testing techniques can narrow the curriculum to preparation for tests rather than fostering a genuine understanding of concepts. Delivering content solely in a lecture format can restrict student interaction and discussion, hindering the development of critical thinking skills that are best nurtured through active engagement and exploration of ideas.