According to Erickson, what distinguishes a generalization from a principle?

The distinction between a generalization and a principle in Erikson's framework lies primarily in the complexity and scope of what each term encompasses. A principle is more robust as it integrates multiple concepts that hold true across different contexts. It serves as a foundational truth or guideline that can be applied broadly and is often supported by a greater body of evidence or reasoning.

On the other hand, generalizations tend to be more simplistic and may lack the depth required to explore the nuances involved in a situation. They can be based on fewer observations and may not adequately account for exceptions or variations, unlike principles that strive for a comprehensive understanding.

Therefore, the idea that principles combine multiple concepts stated as truths captures the essence of their broader application and the theoretical framework they provide. This makes them vital for deeper understanding and application in varied scenarios.